George wrote:No offence Brian, but why would you spend time developing a product, such as the CF trunk, with questionable benefit, when you could be selling underbodies? The benefit of which go way beyond 3-5lbs in weight saving.
How about a carbon or glass underbody please?
No offense George, but it make perfect sense for Brian to develop CF trunk. It is more of a appearance item than performance upgrade. It is a lot easier to market, produce, and sell a CF trunk than a flat under body. Besides, lets face the inevitable truth. How many people will "actually" need the flat under body? I am talking about actual fact. Not people "thinking" they need a flat under body just because that is what all super exotic car equipped with. What is the point to have a flat under body on street? What is the point to have a flat under body when he is not even close to the any reputable lap time with the most usual performance bolt on? For example, why bother with flat under body when you are running 15+ mins a lap on the Ring? Obviously you have a MUCH bigger problem to deal with before any aero upgrade.
Again, no offense, I am one of the rare "get/make only what I need, not what I want" type driver/racer. Retailers like Brian hates customer like me but you should understand where my opinion came from. I totally understand Brian's approach.